The questions we need to ask Congressional Democrats following President Trump’s first Joint Address to Congress: What do you stand for besides singing in unison “We Shall Overcome.” Word to the wise, denying the truth is a defense mechanism that today’s Democrat politicos often use to protect themselves from uncomfortable or unpleasant realities. However, denying the truth can have serious consequences, both on an individual level and for society. Congressional Representatives should pause, reflect, and reconsider the importance of facing reality. It all begins with acknowledging the reality at hand.
Why not stand for the announcement that military
recruiting reached fifteen-year highs? Why not rise to acknowledge a young man
who received news from the President about his acceptance to West Point? Why not pay deference and stand for a woman who lost her
12-year-old daughter to a couple of social deviant iniquitous undocumented
immigrants? Why not stand and support a young female, volleyball player, who
suffered a traumatic brain injury from a biological male masquerading as a
female? Why not stand for a 13-year-old brain cancer survivor who was
ceremoniously given honorary membership into the US Secret Service? Yes, the
question must be asked of every single one of those Democrats who were the
Joint Congressional Address: What do you stand for? Did you
stand for the revelation of
fraud, waste, and abuse of taxpayer greenbacks? Do the democrats believe
themselves so above the law that they are no longer accountable and answerable
to We the People? It seems evident based upon their refusal to stand and talk
about what they do stand for.
Furthermore, do the Democrats stand for a strong military with increased
recruiting? Do they really stand against Title IX and protecting women’s
sports? Do they stand for more American girls and women to be victims of
lawless undocumented immigrants? Do they stand for more human and sex
trafficking? Why do the Democrats remain silently defiant following the capture
of
the ISIS terrorist behind the Abbey Gate bombing, which killed 13 American
service members? So, we must presume that they stand
for Islamic jihadists and extremists, just like with the transnational
narco-criminal terrorists. We all know that the Democrats do stand for
designating concerned parents and pro-life activists as domestic terrorists… not
those who tear down American flags and replace them with Hamas flags. Are there
any Democrats who will stand for the right reason, with the American people?
