The Education Secretary wanted to cut
funding for the department of Education by approximately five percent, but
Congress in their not too infinite wisdom, instead increased its funding by
several billion. Secretary Devos wanted to ramp-up school voucher funding
magnet and charter school programs. Again, Congress in their not too infinite
wisdom denied her request to increase school voucher magnet school and charter
school programs. The Education Secretary wanted to cut after-school and grant
programs for low-income students and redirect the money to school vouchers.
This point begs a question. Is it the school's job to provide after-school
programs that do little to educate a community’s children and prepare them for the future workforce? If so, test results and dropout rates indicate abject failure on the part of too many public-school systems.
I question the prudence of increasing public education
funding, while failing to increase financial resources for school vouchers for
magnet and charter schools. Do we really need millions of dollars in subsidies
for initiatives to reduce school violence, increase mental health services, and
support separate grant programs for counseling, crisis management, and violence
prevention?
Here's a novel idea our Legislative Representatives,
Educrats, School Board members, NEA leaders and membership should think long
and hard about. Why not consider the future economic welfare and job prospects
of students trapped in underperforming schools that fail to meet their basic
educational needs? Why not end a system that forces students into schools based
on their zip code or family income? Is this fair to those kids who happen to
live in impoverished areas? Is it fair to use ghetto children as political
pawns? Furthermore, are not ghetto children part of a community in which a
minority group lives? Like our Congress, our public education system, as it
currently stands is limping through the motions if not already fractured. What
Congress is doing is limiting choices for students by acquiescing to those
politically motivated organizations; primarily, NEA and its membership,
education text publishers, liberal mouth pieces and an ignorant (not to be
confused with stupid) constituent base.
The government should not penalize
zip code children by forcing them to attend substandard secondary education
schools. To do so is tantamount to deprecating, disparaging and vilifying a
segment of a community's citizenry.
No comments:
Post a Comment