Does
not, Control the Media, Control the Narrative equate to a Semi-Serious Coup
d'etat? Furthermore, is control of the media an essential to abort a leader’s
term? Ideally, a resistance should hope to so influence or enlist popular and
established Fourth Estate channels to ensure that 90 percent of all coverage of
the president would be classified as negative. This being the case, have not journalists,
correspondents and commentators purveyed, publicized and peddled ranging from
stories that the
president deliberately phoned and
threatened invasion, or in racist fashion had insulted minorities by removing
the bust of a black civil rights icon from the West Wing? Have not some media
personalities used on-air obscenities in expressing their loathing of the
president, in efforts to normalize the once abnormal? The more imaginary of the
Fourth Estate would ponder the need to jettison disinterested reporting,
claiming the peril that accompanies Trump justifies prejudiced coverage. The
deep-state media might brand as believable a fake-news, tell-all book about the
secret and private lives of the Trump inner circle. Might the resistance stoop
low enough to suggest an illicit relationship involving a porn star and the
president is creditable and might call into question or cast a shadow on the
relevance of 2016’s Presidential election?
No comments:
Post a Comment