If
you’re like me, you have heard many from the progressive left lecture us
about how important it is to be open minded, reject uninformed assumptions, and
avoid assigning guilt or accountability. Has not this non-judgmental mindset
now trickled down into society at large? When there’s a choice between what’s
best for society and best for a select individual who has done something wrong,
do we, more times than not, default to protecting that individual? How’s that
working out for us? Since the stigma around getting a divorce, having a child
out of wedlock or having an abortion has faded, are we better or worse off? Are
the kids who are aborted or who get raised by a single parent instead of a
family better off? Are the guys who are particularly tentative to wed because
they fear divorce better off? Are we better off because people no longer wonder
whether doing something dreadful in public will hurt personal character or ruin
their family’s reputation? The very fact that we are so reluctant to draw a
line in the sand and openly admit, right from wrong has mired our culture in
dissoluteness. Do you suppose, just maybe, if more people felt regretful when committing
egregious acts there would be more conscientious and right-minded human beings?
No comments:
Post a Comment