Wrongdoing flourishes when culpability
wanes. Historically speaking, we have always had select categories or classes
of people who engaged in sexually exploitive misbehavior, and that class was
largely confined to those with power and their sycophants and bottom feeders,
who are no more than opportunists who profits from the misfortunes of others.
But in our classless, open society, a society without ruling class, do we not
pride ourselves on having a mutual standard of demeanor for everyone.
Not exactly, based on fact. When it
comes to sexual exploitation of women, we treat our small privileged class
elite in the same way serfs treated yesteryears privileged class: with
deference. In the United States, three things confer upper class prominence:
renown personage, wealth and power. Entertainment, politics and the media are
built on all three. And elite status in each of those industries bought not
just a mass of opportunities for heartless conduct but also a hushed knowledge
that the downside would be insignificant for engaging in that unkind and
insensitive treatment.
First, the opportunities. Just as
certain peasants of old sought to curry favor with lords, too many Americans
seek to curry favor with the powerful. That's the story of the Hollywood
casting trailer. It's the story of the famed journalist and his nighttime
corner booth at the local pub. It's the story of the politician and his
late-night office meetings. Does anyone think women were dying to meet Harvey
Weinstein or Dustin Hoffman or Charlie Rose or Glenn Thrush or Matt Lauer or Al
Franken or William Clinton? Each story we hear tells the same tale: Women
thought the only way they could get ahead was to indulge these men with
acquiescence. They thought that they couldn't turn down biddings. And if they
were exploited, they thought they had to remain reticent. In many cases, the
victims remained silent. That's because the public offered no consequences to
the elite. Perhaps too many of us blamed the victims and were unwilling to
blame the those responsible. Perhaps the darkest side of humanity revels in the
pain inflicted by others.
So, what's changed now? It's tempting
to say that we've awakened from our societal slumber — that we're unwilling to
allow luminary and wealth and dominance to make allowances for abuse. But is
that being too optimistic? So long as fame and money and power exist, there
will be those who seek to exploit them and those who look the other way. Do not
false idols always have their adherents? It is time to say, enough is enough.
No comments:
Post a Comment