I am one who has long contended that we must see Islamic terror for what
it is, and treat all those who participate in, albeit it as our foes. But this
is not because we fear them, even in our midst. The right response to archenemies
mercilessly bent on evil is not to fear them, but courageously to confront and
defeat them – preferably where they live and conspire their havoc, but here at home,
too, if need be, with all the confidence the American military have ever
demonstrated against the armies of past totalitarian regimes, and every other
merciless adversarial enemy.
We should not fight terrorists by suspending the Second Amendment.
Instead we should understand, respect and implement its stated purpose, while
by all means sustaining the good character required to do so. Instead, the
elitist parties presently in control of our politics foment our fears and
systematically degrade our character. They then take fear and the lack of
character as excuses for curtailing, discarding or suppressing our God-endowed
unalienable rights. This is the agenda of tyranny, true to no principle but
that of despotism.
Dominated by themes
that evoke the nation’s fears and play on nostalgia for lost “greatness,” this
election cycle has an air of a Shakespearian tragedy about it. The presentation of tragedy is
always punctuated with death, and what may prove to be the tragedy of the
American people is no exception. It began with the smoldering Twin Towers in New
York City, claiming the lives of thousands as they collapsed. It now includes
the deaths in attacks at Fort Hood, Boston, San Bernardino and Orlando. But the
most ominous shadow of death is the one that extends across the future of the
Republic itself, its Constitution and the premises of God-endowed right,
including liberty, on which it stands.
Recently, as I was
thinking about the aforementioned themes of this election cycle, FDR’s famous
assertion about fear came to my mind, from the opening of his First Inaugural
Address. Reading it again, I was struck by its juxtaposition of fear and
greatness. But unlike the small-minded, ambition-obsessed politicians of our
day, FDR did not play on our nation’s fears, or exploit nostalgia about its supposedly
lost greatness. He challenged our fear, and spoke to the greatness ever present
within us. Roosevelt’s thinking was not unlike that of Washington and Lincoln who preceded him, and as Reagan would thereafter, appealing to the things we love,
not to our fear of our enemies. In facing the challenges of war and peace, they
knew that, to be true to itself, our nation must always act with the same heart
by remembering the ties that compel us to act for our loved ones, for our nation,
and for the God whose rule of right is what makes just people free. no matter
how the world derides.
This appeal was based
on the fact that, for all their faults, many of the people Americans chose in
the past to represent them in government shared their commitment to preserve
the republican form of government, which relies on the decent character of the
people. In light of this reminder of American statesmanship at its best,
consider the corrupt political appeals of our times. In response to such
assaults as the Orlando massacre, Obama, Hillary Clinton and their ilk urge us
to be overcome by fear. They focus on guns as a totem of the forbidden fruit we
must surrender to avoid destruction. Because guns may be used for evil, we must
act as if we have suddenly become no good – a people so helpless against our
own unruly passions that the very presence of things that require character and
responsibility will destroy us.
No comments:
Post a Comment