If ever there was a display of envy by an American president it
was when Obama pledged the rest of his term fighting income inequality (when
not fund raising and golfing). Imagine the audacity one possesses when they
publicly proclaim that some people make more than other people, that some
people have higher incomes than others, and he says that's not "just."
Maybe it is just me, but Obama's statement appears to be
the rationale for pilfering an economic system on the verge of collapse, not
social justice. The other guy has it, you want it, I will take it. President
Obama's words speak volumes of his economic philosophy, and fundamental
ideology. It conceals a most important deviation from American ideals and
common sense because it ends up not advancing, but betraying, those who support
it. Obama and his pawns have not empowered their legion of followers, they have
enslaved them in a culture of dependence and entitlement, victimization and
anger, instead of adeptness and hope.
President Obama’s premise that you diminish income inequality by
demeaning the successful, seeks to deny the successful the outcomes of their
choices. Why, you may ask? Because, for the most part, income variation in a
free society in general and America in particular is a result of different
choices leading to different outcomes or consequences. Simply put; those who
choose prudently and sensibly have a greater likelihood of success; those who
choose unwisely and recklessly have a far greater likelihood of failure. Choose
wisely my friends, your future depends on it.
No comments:
Post a Comment