Planned Parenthood Somewhere Under the Rainbow

Earlier this summer, many people, including friends of mine, embraced the rainbow symbol and the message of human equality after SCOTUS took it upon itself to redefine marriage.

Actual leaders of “gay rights” organizations universally explain in open partnership with Planned Parenthood, that their concept of “equality” likewise promotes “reproductive health,” which itself includes abortion, does it not? Thus, leading advocates to redefine marriage cite human “equality,” but believe it can coexist with their own decree that only certain human beings are “equal,” while others can be torn apart.

By virtue of a shared concept of “equality” one can easily see where personal conflicts of conscience become unavoidable, almost predictable. Does any refusal to help the activities they have defined as fundamental to sexual license, including abortion, constitutes discrimination?

Recently, America has learned first-hand detailed account that the abortion industry doesn’t just kill babies, it anatomizes or dismembers them. To make matters worse, the little ones are in fact alive at the commencement of the procedure. From what I understand, the same abortion advocates who partner with groups to redefine marriage, including Planned Parenthood, have now united to defend baby organ harvesting as an essential reproductive health option.

Does this not constitute a formal deductive argument made up of a major premise, a minor premise, that are asserted or assumed to be true, and a conclusion? Is this the new human redefinition? Does not this “equality” now redefine man, woman, and marriage, which includes reproductive health, which includes abortion, and baby vivisection. All such “equality” requires “non-discrimination,” which means select citizens must help all things called marriage and reproductive health, including abortion and anatomization, or else be penalized. The same “equality” principle that makes a Christian wedding photographer penniless likewise requires doctors, women, and churches to participate in the abortion medical regime, which includes baby dismemberment. What I am saying is that some people acting in good faith need to examine the assumptions behind what they endorse. If not, they risk finding themselves partnering with Planned Parenthood and all their abortions and baby organ harvesting just like the rainbow equality leaders are doing. Hopefully, the rank and file rainbow coalition folks will speak out against such blatant iniquitous behavior.

Without hue and cry one can only speculate what is to come next. Which individual groups or sub-groups will be derestricted, strong-armed, and gathered next, somewhere under the rainbow?